欢迎来到新坐的写作。这是一个略有不同的部分，而不是我们之前见过的东西。 It's sort of like the writing on the ACT. In fact, it's very similar. But if you're not familiar with that, it's good to tell you that you are going to be dealing with sort of this Frankenstein monster.

It's a cross between the old SAT paragraph that had some grammatical mistakes and a full-on reading comprehension passage. 您实际上不会应对任何理解问题，但这就好像你真的读过整个通道来弄清楚背景 能够弄清楚哪些句子属于实际文章的哪个部分。所以它可以变得非常复杂。

在这个新问题类型的方法之后，我们将在这里讨论的内容，但现在，高概述。 Four passages, 11 prompts each, 44 questions, that's a lot of reading. Each question is going to contain four answer choices. For those of you transitioning from the old SAT, that's probably a good thing. That means one answer choice fewer.

But, or and, I should add most questions will also have the answer choice, no change, so you're going to actually be reading not quite as much per question. 同样，并非所有44个问题都不会改变作为一种选择，但很高兴知道它在那里。 In a way, it makes only three answers for you to read through per question, but, of course, the bad news is you have a lot to read through, 350 to 450 words.

它们往往比350字更接近450。最后，我正在添加的唯一原因是因为这是一个标准化的测试和 they do things in a very similar format. For instance, you have 11 prompts here, four passages. This is always the same. What's also the same?

他们将从社会科学中获取一些东西，所以你可以阅读交通模式，有人写作那样的东西，或者 sciences, where they get pretty hard core with DNA. Personal narratives. These ones aren't too bad. It's just someone writing about their experience.

出于某种原因，他们真的被选中或专注于这项业务和职业生涯。所以他们可以用第三人称写作。 These are new jobs opening up or someone kind of combine here on personal narrative writing about their business experience. So why this is important is if you find out that you're better at some of these than the other ones, well, two things, you can focus on 让你的弱点更强壮，所以如果你的科学弱，让我们专注于此。

But you can also know which ones to do in terms of order. So if you're running out of time and you encounter that science passage towards the end, the second to last one, you may want to look at the very last of the four passages. 因为如果你擅长商业和职业，因为那些人​​往往难以那么困难，万博max手机版 然后你可能想先做那些问题。

好的。所以我们已经谈论了战略。 And there will be one graph-related question per section, not per passage. I know a lot of people freak out about this, so go to the lessons there. But in terms of strategy, strategy is big. And that's why this approach I'm going to talk to you about I think will help you.

这是我的理论，我的假设。但是处理这段段落的最佳方式如下。 But I may be wrong. And so what you guys are going to do is apply what you learn in this video and try it out and see if it works. If it doesn't, then you can change back to one of these methods.

所以我将向你展示三种方法，然后，当然，支持其中一个。第一，首先阅读整个段落。 That means you sit there, you read all 450 words, and then you do the questions relating to the entire passage, of course. 现在，这个缺点。这不是阅读理解段落， 这意味着你实际上并不是要读一切，并了解每个部分以及如何在阅读Comp段落中携手共进。

So you don't have to do that. And it does waste too much time when you read the entire passage. 当我们不可避免地做时，你可能会变得有点无聊。你已经读了这么读 很多关于这个新的坐着，所以浪费时间让你更累。但有一些优点。

You will have an overall sense of the passage. You've read the entire thing. 你不仅仅打开了这本​​书并潜入问题，这是第二种方法。 根本不读这段经文。只是做出问题。

Cons, you'll miss the big picture questions. There are big picture questions, not reading comprehension per se, but the way that sentences go together and transition between paragraphs. And sometimes there's even a question asking you does this paragraph even make 在这里或我们应该在第三段之前移动它。所以你会错过那些，所以这很重要，但 it will save you a lot of time at first.

My hypothesis, what I've noticed with students, is when they use this method, they spend a lot of time rereading, and they don't really know which part to reread. And sometimes they try to start from the beginning once they realize they need to reread more of it or read it for the first time really. And they start from the beginning and then they realize that they didn't, 他们读了所有不必要的东西等等，所以当他们实际上要回去时，他们就会迷失在通道中 找到其中一个大图片问题的答案。

So it is though useful, and again going back to strategies, if you're running out of time, this is a great approach. 你肯定想使用这个。最后一段，尽可能多的问题。 做那些不处理大图片问题的人，只是小的语法标点符号。

Do those questions. Don't read the passage. That approach too is great. Of course, there's Approach 3. 这就是它。阅读每个段落。

And then do the questions relating to that paragraph. So you're going to read paragraph one. 那里有两个问题。做这两个问题。 Move on to the next paragraph. If there are four questions in the next paragraph, great.

你必须先阅读整个段落，然后做这四个问题。所以这并不像阅读段落一样快， 因为你要停止，你知道，去做实际问题。但您将注意到的是在段落中的转换， transitions between the paragraphs, and that's going to be very helpful for the big picture questions.

And you will have enough context to understand a lot of these questions, the big picture ones. You'll get a better sense of these transitions within sentences as well exactly what the author is saying in the paragraph. And I think this is what's going to be so helpful, is that the test is really focusing on the paragraph meaning, 不是整个段落意味着阅读Comp段落的方式。

所以，再次，我的假设是这是最好的方法。当然，当你回到处理大图片思想的那些问题时， 甚至你不必重读段落或通道。你会知道去哪里以及读什么。 所以带走所有这一切都是实验。我希望您尝试此段方法，方法3。

Read a paragraph. Do the questions relating to that paragraph. Go on to the next paragraph. It may at first be weird. 你不习惯，那很好。这就是我期望的。

所以我希望你在至少三个不同的段落上尝试一下。并不是背靠背一点。 你的大脑需要时间学习，休息，治愈，制作那些新的突触联系。 所以一件好事是在几天内尝试出来，展开你的练习，做段落，在星期一说，一段段落。

Try this approach. Then on Tuesday, try it again. Then maybe skip a day Wednesday, and on Thursday do a third passage. Try this approach and see if you feel more comfortable if you have a better sense of the passage and if you're getting more questions right. Because if you are, then this is an awesome approach, and 我认为它会为你工作。

实验。但如果没有，那么然后尝试其中一个方法和 看哪一个是更好的you. And I think you're going to find, amongst these three approaches, one that works magic. My hope though, of course, is the paragraph approach, but we will see.